Just a few short years ago, cable’s biggest threat was satellite TV. The satellite television providers hit the scene offering a plethora of channels and what seemed like a much better deal at the time. It wasn’t too long before consumers came to the conclusion that both were pretty similar in terms of programming options and price. Cable and satellite TV providers now have something even more in common as both are faced with the ever looming threat of internet TV. Competition Heats up in the Paid TV Business Over the past two years, major cable companies have been reporting record losses in terms of revenue and subscribers. These losses certainly are not the result of people watching less sitcoms, movies and talk shows. They are a reflection of how times have changed and how much the internet has impacted the paid TV industry. And while the acts of piracy and illegal streaming have been factors in the shift, there are plenty of legitimate internet-based competitors for the traditional television providers to be worried about. In 2007, Apple came out with its Apple TV, an IPTV-based (Internet Protocol Television) service that delivers programming content to the viewer via a digital media receiver. Being such a bold step at the time of its arrival enabled this particular service to make Apple a pioneer in the paid internet TV sector. The continuous addition of new programming options has enabled it to survive. Apple TV users can enjoy movies and sports, make rental purchases from Netflix, and even view content from video sharing sites like Vimeo and YouTube. Despite claims of not wanting to enter the TV business, Apple looks to have a very sustainable alternative in its internet-powered television box. When it’s all said and done, Google may be the biggest piece of the internet TV puzzle. Seemingly motivated by the luscious oasis of advertising revenue, Google launched its Google TV in 2010. Though similar to Apple’s product, Google has added some elements that distance it from the competition. Built on the company’s flexible Android operating system, Google TV boasts a Linux-powered Chrome browser, picture-in-picture functionality and integration with Netflix and Dish Network, with HBO and CNBC being among the main content providers. As an added bonus, the consumer can use their Android or iPhone device as a remote control. Despite mediocre reviews and a lukewarm response, there are plenty of reasons to view Google as a legitimate threat in the internet TV game. In fact, some of the traditional media players have been quite aggressive in refusing to support Google on its initiatives. ABC, CBS, NBC and Hulu (ironically, another company in the IPTV business) have all blocked out their programming from Google TV users. Meanwhile, more companies are gearing up to join Apple and Google in the internet television sector to give the traditional players an even bigger run for their money. Reliability a Factor The appeal to IPTV and internet TV technology in general is all in the possibilities. Interactivity with browsers, media players and other apps can create experiences that customers migrating over from conventional services will absolutely cherish. Internet TV definitely appears to be on the rise, but the old industry does have one thing on its side, and that is a longstanding history of reliability. Cable experiences little to no downtime, and satellite has been steadily improving. Though attractive, what the internet has to offer is unproven to the average consumer. With companies like Dish Network actually indulging in IPTV, it could only be a matter of time before internet television becomes a regular fixture in the world of paid programming. Those putting up resistance may just be delaying the inevitable.
Politicians are increasingly using the internet to digitize their campaign efforts. The use of online video was critical in the historic Presidential election of 2008, and once again the President’s team is using it to influence the public. In an effort to promote Obama’s new American Jobs Act, the Democratic National Committee (DNC) launched what turned out be a viral marketing campaign on Monday September 12. The governing group of the U.S. Democratic party, the DNC, leveraged the combination of online video and advertisements to get the attention of their ideal supporters in hopes of winning them over enough to get their votes on the American Jobs Act, the President’s new plan for creating jobs throughout the nation. The ultimate goal was directing consumers to a website where they could learn more about the plan. The DNC used a three-part video series to drive its advertising initiatives, which were kicked off with “14 Months,” a TV ad that featured President Obama speaking on the proposed jobs act while reminding us that the next election is a mere 14 months away. Up next was the online ads, starting with “Tomorrow,” a 30-second spot promoting the act through testimonials of consumers speaking on the need for creating jobs. This was followed by “Relief,” the 15-second spot that may have made the biggest impact online. Another video ad designed to highlight the importance of Obama’s plan, Relief ran on multiple sites, including Facebook, YouTube, Hulu, Pandora, the Huffington Post and several other news outlets. Recapturing the Magic Harnessing the power of video and the internet in general is nothing new for the DNC. Having used it successfully in the past, the committee is certainly no stranger to online marketing. It tapped into the resources of the digital channel to score its biggest victory ever and help wrap up the election in 2008. And while the DNC’s success can be attributed to a variety of factors, YouTube in particular was hugely instrumental in the outcome. You may recall that there was a point in the grueling 2008 election when Obama’s chances of winning were slim. Videos of Reverend Jeremiah Wright’s controversial sermons were circulating through YouTube, and public perception of the presidential hopeful was starting to wane. In a strategic move, Obama’s team fought back by promoting a lengthy speech he delivered focusing on race relations to a Philadelphia crowd. Not only did the clip of that speech calm the concerns of voters, it also tallied up well over five million views on YouTube, more than any other video of its kind. By the time election day rolled around, 28% of voters admitted to watching Obama’s videos online. While true intentions are always questionable when political gain is on the line, even members of the Republican party have come out to speak on the brilliance of the DNC’s latest advertising program. All signs are pointing to the digital channel playing an even bigger role in the upcoming Presidential election than it did in the monumental election of 2008.